The objectivity of Morality

 Morality is objective insofar as it deals with how to achieve the one goal all goal-having beings have, namely, fulfillment; for to aim at any goal, regardless of the goal, is to aim to fulfill the goal; but as such, all aims are bound up with the aim of fulfillment of some sort, and so with fulfillment as such.

As such, objective morality simply follows from a conceptual analysis of the notion of goal making, where one also takes into account one's own circumstances, and so whether or not one's means and ends will help to achieve the fulfillment one can't help but aim at; all aim at fulfillment, whether they admit it or not, whether they recognize it or not, it is simply inherent to the logic of having goals; and this also means that 'all particular goals' are ultimately 'means' to this greater and ultimate end of fulfillment itself; and morality then is about success or failure at achieving that one highest goal; for some chosen means (including our chosen subsidiary goals) may aid us in achieving fulfillment, but some will not, and will rather hinder us; thus there is an objective answer to what particular means and ends you should have, because 'all' particular means and ends are bound up in the logic of trying to achieve the 'universal' end of fulfillment.
This is also why self discovery and philosophical anthropology is important; for if you do not know who and what you are, then you will not know what limits you have in attaining fulfillment, and so will not know what means and ends you should take on in order to achieve fulfillment, and whether you recognize it or not, if you have intellect and will, 'you are aiming at fulfillment'; since again, it's just part of the logic of having aims (and having an intellect and will is likewise part of that logic; for the will just is the thing that selects the aim, and the intellect is what lets you understand the concepts you have which serve to compose your options, and so your aims.)
Thus having an accurate idea of who one is, will lead to an accurate idea of what one's own self in particular needs for fulfillment, and as we are human i.e. as being human is part of who and what we are, then to have an accurate idea of human nature (philosophical anthropology) gives you an idea as to what will fulfill 'humans specifically' and so one's own self in particular; thus it is in human nature to have an intellect and will, and so to seek fulfillment; but it is also human nature to have mind and body; and so to have mental and bodily needs, and so these need to be fulfilled in order to be a fulfilled human, and likewise it is human nature to be social, and so to have societal needs, and these too must be fulfilled in order for us to reach fulfillment; if we are missing anything on any of these points, then fulfillment is wanting.
Thus rational debate and dialogue on morality can be focused more or less around these topics of the logic of goal making taken in relation to the logic and science of self-discovery and human nature, and insofar as the self and the human species exists within the world, so the logic and science about the whole world is important, to gain a sense of the context and so the proper application of all this information to the ultimate aim of fulfillment as such. This to me, seems to be the rough boundaries of the domain of discourse of ethics.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What Cuts Through the Mind

  The line between good and evil cuts through the heart of man, and the line between true and false cuts through his mind. There are many good forms of neutrality; neutrality in listening to another person's views i.e. bracketing one's own beliefs for the moment so as to better attend to what they say, this is good since it allows the truth of another person's view to arise more clearly in one's mind. Neutrality is also an essential step in phenomenology, it is the 'epoche' of the reduction, likewise a bracketing of one's views so that as unbiased a description of phenomena as possible can arise. Once again, neutrality in forming one's arguments, that is, by appealing to premises which one knows (or at least, has good reason to believe) are common ground between one's interlocutor and one's self, rather than appealing to premises which one knows (or again, has good reason to believe) one's interlocutor shall dispute; this too is a good form o...
Read more

Meme Response 2

Image
 Here's another Meme I found in r/Enlightenment and decided to respond to:  I find it depends on the stranger and the exact form their resentment and hostility takes. Fir their are many people who, even in their resentment and hostility, still hold themselves up to certain rules of conduct: perhaps it's sometimes some intuitive sense of honor, or some instinctively held ideal of fair play, or some habitually held value of good morals placed in them from their upbringing; etc. Whatever form it takes, this inclination towards a certain code of conduct makes it possible, even in the midst of their hostility, to have a fruitful discussion with them, if you are willing to endure their resentment and hostility with patience. To wit, sometimes such discussions end up breaking down despite their code; since perhaps you will lose patience or they will give into the temptations of their resentment and hostility despite their otherwise sincere attempts at good conduct, or perhaps a mix o...
Read more

Response to a Meme

Image
I came across this meme on r/Enlightenment and figured I'd share it and my response to it:  Evidently there is more than thought, since the blankness of the subsequent statement is not thought, but a sensible image, so along with thoughts there are sensible images. Sensible images clearly vary, as we have white on the one side, and black on the other; and of course, there is the sensible image of the various colors in the meme, the cartoon faces, the words, etc. in turn, outside of this meme there is the whole web-page, which is not merely a still image but a moving one, it can scroll up or down.  In turn, there is the moving image of the body before the screen; the hand holding the phone, or typing on the keyboard, etc. human bodies abound, as distinct from the bodies of animals, plans, and inanimate objects, and from the space in which these exist; and among these human bodies there is a body in experience distinct from others. It is one experienced most frequently, yet als...
Read more